The answer to 1984... is 1776


Thursday, July 29, 2010

WHAT IS THE NEW WORLD ORDER?

IS IT FACT? or FICTION?

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

google trends comparison: AJ, RUSH, BECK, MATHEWS, HANNITY. (CHART)

WIKILEAKS PUTS ON THE SPIIN


It’s No Secret: Afghanistan Is a Quagmire



U.S. Air Force / Tech. Sgt. Francisco V. Govea II
By Eugene Robinson

The tens of thousands of classified military documents posted on the Internet Sunday confirm what critics of the war in Afghanistan already knew or suspected: We are wading deeper into a long-running, morally ambiguous conflict that has virtually no chance of ending well.
The Obama administration, our NATO allies and the Afghan government responded to the documents—made public by a gadfly organization known as Wikileaks—by saying they tell us nothing new. 

Which is the problem.
We already had plenty of evidence that elements within Pakistan’s intelligence services were giving support and guidance to the Taliban insurgency inside Afghanistan, even though Pakistan is supposed to be our ally in the fight against the terrorists. The newly released documents don’t provide conclusive proof, but they do give a sense of how volu

5 REASONS NOT TO PAY YOUR CREDIT CARDS; VISA, MC

5 Reasons NOT to Pay Your Credit Cards

Are you one of the millions of Americans trying to decide between paying your credit card bills and eating?   

John Galt -- Activist Post

We live in a matrix that goes to unspeakable expense to nurture us from the teat to be good consumers. You are issued a tax collection number at birth (SS#), another artificial number for your credit worthiness (FICO), and then you're extended a certain amount of tokens to play "life" based on those numbers.  This virtual currency, not unlike your earned Farmville coins, only has value because you give it value.  

It is a brilliantly designed game:  the banksters create a unit of money out of thin air; lend it to people with interest attached; get them to buy real items; then raise the rates, force people to work harder, hover like a vulture until expected default occurs, and rake in the forfeited assets.  Best of all, when the whole Ponzi scheme comes crashing down because they drunkenly gambled with your interest payments, the very people who destro

NOW, I'VE GOT A FEW QUESTIONS FOR FACEBOOK!

PSYCHIATRY: EXPOSED

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

SCIENTISTS MAKE CANCER CELLS VANISH

Scientists make cancer cells vanish


* Cancer Research UK said results were encouraging

EXCLUSIVE: Helen Puttick, Health Correspondent
Share 0 comments

21 Apr 2010

Scottish scientists have made cancer tumours vanish within 10 days by sending DNA to seek and destroy the cells.

The system, developed at Strathclyde and Glasgow universities, is being hailed as a breakthrough because it appears to eradicate tumours without causing harmful side-effects. A leading medical journal has described the results so far as remarkable, while Cancer Research UK said they were encouraging.

Dr Christine Dufes, a lecturer at the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences and leader of the research, said: “The tumours were completely gone within 10 days. It is fantastic. When you talk about 10 days that is the time frame for curing a cold. Imagine if within 10 days you could completely make a tumour disappear.”

Researchers around the world are trying to find ways to use genes as a cancer treatment, but one problem is ensuring they attack the tumour without destroying healthy tissue.

In laboratory experiments the Strathclyde research team used a plasma protein called transferrin, which carries iron through the blood, to deliver the therapeutic DNA to the right spot. Once in situ the DNA produced a protein that attacked the tumour cells.

The findings have been published in the Journal of Controlled Release, with an accompanying comment from editor Professor Kinam Park, of Purdue University, Indiana, saying other attempts to target genes at cancer cells have “seldom shown complete disappearance of tumours”.

The research was initially supported with a grant from charity Tenovus Scotland, which supports the work of young scientists to help their ideas get off the ground.

WAL-MART TRACK'S CLOTHING: RFID

Wal-Mart Radio Tags to Track Clothing









MIGUEL BUSTILLO
Wall Street Journal
July 23, 2010


"Better yet put them on your kids and keys so you stop losing them all the time."




Mart Stores Inc. plans to roll out sophisticated electronic ID tags to track individual pairs of jeans and underwear, the first step in a system that advocates say better controls inventory but some critics say raises privacy concerns.

Starting next month, the retailer will place removable “smart tags” on individual garments that can be read by a hand-held scanner. Wal-Mart workers will be able to quickly learn, for instance, which size of Wrangler jeans is missing, with the aim of ensuring shelves are optimally stocked and inventory tightly watched. If successful, the radio-frequency ID tags will be rolled out on other products at Wal-Mart’s more than 3,750 U.S. stores.

“This ability to wave the wand and have a sense of all the products that are on the floor or in the back room in seconds is something that we feel can really transform our business,” said Raul Vazquez, the executive in charge of Wal-Mart stores in the western U.S.

Read Entire Article

7 Secret Ways We Are Being Poisoned: ON PURPOSE

7 Secret Ways We Are Being Poisoned

Activist Post
July 27, 2010

The objectivism of the scientific method seems to have been hijacked by corporations who often pay for scientists to support their products, as well as politicians who move through the revolving door between the private and public sector. Even worse is that sometimes the consumer protection agencies themselves are complicit.


Monsanto started as a chemical company that brought the world poisons like Agent Orange and Roundup.


The trust placed by consumers in scientific studies and Federal oversight committees has been violated in service to profit so that products are allowed to enter the marketplace with reduced safety standards. The synthetic chemicals we encounter on a daily basis in our food, water, and environment are increasingly shown to be disastrous to our physical and mental well-being. Volumes can be written — indeed have been written — by experts in both mainstream and alternative medicine who have documented the sleight of hand used to hoodwink consumers and threaten our health. The categories below are worth deeper investigation as prime examples of what we might face as a species if this chemical bombardment continues.

GMO foods – Monsanto started as a chemical company that brought the world poisons like Agent Orange and Roundup. Now they are more well known for their domination of Genetically Modified agriculture, owning nearly 90% of staple GMO crops such as corn, soy, and cotton. In independent studies GMO “frankenfood” has been linked to organ failure, and a recent Russian study has concluded near-total sterility in GMO-soy-fed hamsters by the third generation. Despite these and many other legitimate health concerns, it is unlikely that the Monsanto-controlled FDA will curb the growth of GMO foods, while the USDA’s biotechnology risk assessment research arm has a paltry $3 million at its disposal. Of course the industry-funded studies show that the effects GMO on human health are “negligible.”

Food additives – When most of us think of harmful food additives we think of Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) which is still in many processed foods, but unfortunately MSG appears to be the least of the poisons now found in our food. In 2008 Melamine was found in infant formula and some food products from China; the FDA went on record to say it was OK, despite sickening tens of thousands. Dangerous food additives appear in nearly all processed foods with even the most common food dyes Red 40, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 being linked to cancer. Most recently 92,000 pounds of frozen chicken was recalled because it contained “blue plastic pieces,” while McDonald’s Chicken McNuggets have been found to have “silly putty” chemicals in them. In fact, some researchers estimate that today’s chicken is so full of chemicals that it only contains 51% actual meat.

Fluoride — Not all fluoride is bad; only the type promoted by dentistry and added to our water and food supply. Calcium fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral, while its synthetic counterpart, sodium fluoride (silicofluoride), is an industrial-grade hazardous waste material made during the production of fertilizer. It’s past history includes patented use as rat poison and insecticide. There are many blind- and double-blind studies that show sodium fluoride has a cumulative effect

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

THE HIV MYTH: PREPARE FOR THE CHANGE OF YOUR LIFE



Editors note: This documentary could rival anything Micheal Moore or Alex Jones has done.


"Simply put, the greatest film of 2010".

Dave Wells, Editor NWH

Monday, July 19, 2010

TEA PARTY TERRORISTS? NEO CON'S HIJACKED THE MOVEMENT

Kurt Nimmo

The Tea Party movement is now almost completely unrecognizable from what it was a few short years ago. It came to prominence in 2008 when the Libertarian Party of Illinois planned to hold an April 15, 2009 anti-tax “Boston Tea Party” in Chicago. In February 2009, the idea grew after CNBC personality Rick Santelli, speaking from the floor of the Chicago stock exchange, criticized the Obama administration’s tax and economic policies and urged Americans become Tea Party activists.



Yemen



Establishment Republicans plan to run Sarah Palin as the Tea Party presidential candidate.


In fact, the idea began as the Boston Tea Party in 2006. It was founded by a group of former Libertarian Party members who criticized the party for its “abdication of political responsibilities,” declaring that “Americans deserve and desperately need a pro-freedom party that forcefully advocates libertarian solutions to the issues of today.” The Boston Tea Party opposed statism at all levels. “The Boston Tea Party supports reducing the size scope and power of government at all levels and on all issues, and opposes increasing the size, scope and power of government at any level, for any purpose.”
How things have changed.
It didn’t take long for establishment

Republicans to steal the idea and claim it as their own. A few weeks after Rick Santelli made his comments, Ron Paul’s media coordinator Steve Gordon went on MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow show and complained about what he characterized as an attempt by Republicans to hijack the idea. Gordon specifically blamed former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.

It didn’t take long for Republicans to embrace the idea. RNC Chairman Michael St

IF BP DECEIVES YOU LIKE THIS.. THEN WHAT ELSE ARE THEY LYING ABOUT?

(Bump) BP photoshops fake photo of crisis command center, posts on main BP site



UPDATE: 11:14PM Eastern: BP has now posted the "original" photo, they claim. Except - surprise - they are refusing to post the high-resolution version of the new "original" photo. They posted the high-res version of the altered photo earlier, and in fact, that version is still live via a link below the new photo. Why not post the high-res version of the new "original" photo? Afraid someone is going to enlarge it and find out it's fake too?

UPDATE 10:37PM Eastern: The Washington Post has the story now. Oddly, BP is now claiming that the photo is real - but it showed blank screens, and rather than show blank screens at AP's crisis center, they instead put fake content-filled screens in the photo. Uh, a few questions.

1) Why were the screens in the crisis center blank in the middle of the crisis? Coffee break?
2) The BP spokesman claims that the photographer photoshopped the changes. Really? A professional photographer hired by BP Photoshops so poorly that a 12 year old kid could do a better job. Really? Let me show you what BP said exactly, and then the photo that supposedly this "professional" edited:
Scott Dean, a spokesman for BP, said that there was nothing sinister in the photo alteration and provided the original unaltered version. He said that a photographer working for the company had inserted the three images in spots where the video screens were blank.
Now here is the Photoshop job that the "professional" photographer did - this is just one part of the photo that he screwed up:



Anyone who has ever used Photoshop knows that this is an incredibly amateur job. I can do far better than this, and I tend to play with Photoshop for fun. We're to believe that a professional photographer did this poor a job, for pay, for a huge corporate client? Really? No one would hire this photographer again if this is true. Oh, and the photographer added the fake screens to the photo, what, without BP's permission? That's what they're implying, "the photographer did it."

3) Why does the meta data show that the photo was actually taken on March 6, 2001? Or is BP next going to tell us that their professional photographer has never set the time and date stamp on his multi-thousand dollar camera? Because then all of his photos for all of his clients will be screwed up. Really?
______________________________________

UPDATE: The photo contains data suggesting it was taken in 2001, not July of 2010 as claimed on BP's Web site. That would suggest, at least one possibility is, that BP took an old photo and Photoshopped new pictures of the oil spill over it, to make it look "new." More on this at the end of the post.

I guess if you're doing fake crisis response, you might as well fake a photo of the crisis response center. Why do they need a fake photo at all? Don't they have a real crisis response center they could have used?

Original BP Photo that is linked off of this page, with a snippet of the photo:



Note the bad Photoshop job on the parts I cropped and blew up - click on each photo to see the larger version, which makes it painfully clear that they faked the photo (poorly, at that):















UPDATE: BP has apologized for the Photoshopped version of its command center, and it has just released this new, unedited version.



In all seriousness, an astute reader noticed that the meta info for the photo says it was created in 2001, not July 16, 2010 as claimed on BP's site. It looks like BP took a photo from 2001, and in order to make it look like the command center in July of 2010, they pasted pictures of the oil well leaking over the old photo.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

SARAH PALIN IS A CUNT

.COMMENTS & PHOTO FROM FACEBOOK.
Amanda
‎"only ok to use if you own it..." WTF does THAT mean?
I think this is hilarious. I wouldn't wear it, cunt is a little foul, even for me, but I would high five the shit out of this guy if I ever saw him!
4 hours ago · · Flag
Dont Tell Kay
Dont Tell...
IT'S A FREE FUCKING COUNTRY... 'UNACCEPTABLE' MY ASS... LOOK THE OTHER WAY THEN!! FUCKING FASCIST!!
3 hours ago · · 2 peopleLoading... ·
Brandon X Echols
Brandon ,,
I don't own either :(
2 hours ago · · Flag
Victoria Parker
Victoria ...
AWESOME!! (cuz she IS)
about an hour ago · · Flag
Chase Conaway
Chase...
no she is a "good conservative, kind of like Good ol Glenn Beck" and going to save America, just like obama is a "constitutionalist" & going to save America.
I agree w Victoria & I vote brilliant!
I would have however, preferred less tight jeans especially in the man junk area ;-(
about an hour ago · · Flag

Amanda...
Pffft, get over yourself with that feminazi bullshit. I thought "conservative" women were supposed to be above that? Hah... Lesson learned boys? Libertarian chicks are the best ;-)
35 minutes ago · · Flag
Amanda Trbovich
Amanda...
And not only is Palin a cunt, she's also a stupid piece of shit sad excuse for someone who has aspirations of running this country. The sad part? Retards everywhere will vote for her. How many of them know that this woman considers herself a Constitutionalist and could name name ONE Founding Father?
29 minutes ago · · Flag

Amanda...
could not*
26 minutes ago · · Flag
Vanessa Versailles Ma'et
Vanessa...
Wow and ive been busy working and missed all this
24 minutes ago · · Flag

'BILDERBERG' #8 GOOGLE TRENDS


BILDERBERG TO STAGE (ANOTHER 9/11) ATTACK TO BLAME ON TERRORISTS


Top Clinton Official: Only A Terror Attack Can Save Obama



  • The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store
Top Clinton Official: Only A Terror Attack Can Save Obama 140710top
Bilderberger Shapiro says President needs new OKC or 9/11 as a way of “demonstrating that he is a leader” before November elections and reversing plunging approval ratings.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com


Wednesday, July 14, 2010

A former senior advisor to President Bill Clinton says that the only thing which can rescue Barack Obama’s increasingly tenuous grip on power as his approval figures continue to plunge is a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11, another startling reminder that such events only ever serve to benefit those in authority.

Buried in a Financial Times article about Obama’s “growing credibility crisis” and fears on behalf of

Democrats that they could lose not only the White House but also the Senate to Republicans, Robert Shapiro makes it clear that Obama is relying on an October surprise in the form of a terror attack to rescue his presidency.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

Shapiro’s veiled warning should not be dismissed lightly. He was undersecretary of commerce for economic affairs dung Clinton’s tenure in the Oval Office and also acted as princi

Monday, July 12, 2010

Poll: Do you agree with how police handled the G20 protests?

Poll: Do you agree with how police handled the G20 protests?

Thank you for voting!

Total Votes: 6,889



trudyf wrote:Posted 2010/07/10
at 8:41 AM ETIt was a sad day for Canada. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms was clearly
violated. The majority of protesters were peaceful and did not justified the police state imposed by the government. It appears to me that it was the police that had the mob mentality and violently attacked many of the protesters .The violence is usually started by police provacators at large protests to feed the media and project negative views of protesters.
Memphis wrote:Posted 2010/07/10
at 2:12 AM ETThe Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees everyone in Canada the right to freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly. It also guarantees the right of all persons to be free from arbitrary detention and unreasonable search and seizure. These constitutional liberties – and the limits they place on government and police – are the foundati

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

TORONTO POWER OUT

 
Power outage hits Toronto during Queen's visit
"There was some panic because many people were working in high-rise buildings... and the lifts stopped working."
"People were hurrying down staircases to the ground floor and then headed out to their cars" or to the train station, he said, but there were no traffic lights and so tens of thousands of motorists got stuck in traffic jams.
Thousands of people also packed into Union Station to wait for subway cars and commuter trains to trickle back into service after power was restored. "Gradually the crowds started departing," said Raja.
NOTE: Notice how instinctively we fear. Picture a thousand years ago without an i-pad, we've been trained to fear and fear is the catalyst of control.

TORONTO — An explosion at a Toronto power facility knocked out power in Canada's largest metropolis, and briefly disrupted a state dinner for Queen Elizabeth II.

Hydro One, the power company for Canada's most populous province of Ontario, said the blackout hit at 4:42 pm local time (2042 GMT), affecting the city's subway, several commuter trains and traffic lights at the height of the evening rush hour.

Up to 250,000 people in the city center were also without electricity -- an estimated 900 megawatts in total lost from the grid -- amid an extreme heat alert, Daniele Gauvin, spokeswoman for provincial utility, told
AFP.

Temperatures in the city reached 34 degrees Celsius (93 Fahrenheit).
Public broadcaster CBC said firefighters were kept busy rescuing people trapped in elevators while policemen directed traffic.

The queen, at the end of a nine-day trip to Canada with her husband, Prince Philip, was to attend a state dinner hosted by Prime Minister Stephen Harper at the Royal York Hotel in downtown Toronto, but the hotel was without power leading up to the event.

Monday, July 5, 2010